Magzter Gold (Sitewide CA)
Forbes (Digital)

Forbes (Digital)

1 Issue, February/March 2025

Hoard and Hedge

Hoard and Hedge
Midas Touch?
Imaru Casanova in Van Eck's Manhattan headquarters. Her office is far less dangerous than the sketchy aircraft she boarded to visit remote mines in Ghana, Mexico and Russia.
In 1991 Imaru Casanova, age 16, won a foreign-studies scholarship, left Venezuela and arrived in Denver knowing scarcely a word of English. Her language instruction course happened to be at the Colorado School of Mines. So perhaps it was providential that after a roundabout career that began in mechanical engineering, she found herself last year visiting a gold mine near Jacobina, Brazil.
Casanova, 50, runs the $700 million Van Eck International Investors Gold Fund. Among its holdings is Pan American Silver; among Pan American's assets is that gold mine in the Brazilian forest. The mine ostensibly contains between 100 and 280 tons of gold, worth between $8.6 billion and $22 billion at present prices once the metal is, with considerable difficulty, extracted from the dirt in which it is dispersed.
Over the past decade the Van Eck fund has delivered 6.3% annually, net of its 1.4% expense ratio. That return puts it ahead of the 5.1% average Morningstar calculates for the precious metals category, but short of what you could have had from a stock index fund. Why own gold?
The desirability of gold, half of which is used for jewelry or electronic parts, rests on its value as a hedge against inflationary mischief from issuers of currency. Sometimes this works. Eggs are getting expensive. Gold was up 27% in 2024.
As an object to hoard, gold competes with Bitcoin. Bitcoin has a known limit on supply. Gold does not, but it seems that after several millennia of searching, humans have found most of the easily accessible sources. “It is increasingly difficult to find large deposits,” Casanova says, “and increasingly difficult to get permits for the mines.”
Casanova’s actively managed fund competes with funds that do nothing but sit on gold bars stored in a vault. The case for preferring mining shares to ingots is twofold.
First is that the miners can make money and pay dividends even if the price of gold doesn’t budge. The 40 companies in the Van Eck portfolio trade at an average 11 times earnings. A gain in a stock market that trades at 21 times.
The other part of the pitch is that mines deliver leverage. Pan American spends $1,516 on average to pull a troy ounce of gold from the ground. The gold is worth not quite double that. Thus, a 50% increase in the price of gold makes for better than a doubling of profit. The leverage, of course, works just as strongly in reverse.
Casanova got degrees in mechanical engineering from Case Western, worked for lubricant and adhesives companies and, at age 25, went to Shell Oil. She measured drill pipe on a barge in Lake Maracaibo, near where she grew up, keeping her hair short to reduce the risk of being caught in the machinery. “I was used to being the only woman in the room,” she says.
She could have risen through the ranks at Shell but didn’t love the idea of living in Houston. So she moved to New York and cold-called financial firms. A research boutique was looking for an oil-and-gas analyst. She didn’t have the usual Wharton degree, but she did have a particularly relevant job on her résumé and was hired.
Oil and gold valuations follow parallel tracks: Assess reserves, what must be spent to get them into a barrel or melting pot and how effective the owner is at replacing them. Casanova migrated from black gold to yellow, then began the job-hopping customary on Wall Street before settling in at Van Eck in 2011. She was named portfolio manager at its active gold fund in 2023.
“There is risk everywhere,” she says. She could be talking about price volatility, or she could be talking about underground hazards. That Pan American mine features The helicopter pilot thought it ...
You're reading a preview of
Forbes (Digital) - 1 Issue, February/March 2025

DiscountMags is a licensed distributor (not a publisher) of the above content and Publication through Magzter Inc. Accordingly, we have no editorial control over the Publications. Any opinions, advice, statements, services, offers or other information or content expressed or made available by third parties, including those made in Publications offered on our website, are those of the respective author(s) or publisher(s) and not of DiscountMags. DiscountMags does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, truthfulness, or usefulness of all or any portion of any publication or any services or offers made by third parties, nor will we be liable for any loss or damage caused by your reliance on information contained in any Publication, or your use of services offered, or your acceptance of any offers made through the Service or the Publications. For content removal requests, please contact Magzter.

© 1999 – 2025 DiscountMags.com All rights reserved.